Nails v. Walmart

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Nails v. Walmart

252 So. 3d 332

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 25, 2018

DocketNo. 3D17-804

StatusPublished

This text of 252 So. 3d 332 (Nails v. Walmart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nails v. Walmart, 252 So. 3d 332 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(o ), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing four-year limitations period in action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, or false imprisonment); § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing two-year limitations period in action for libel or slander); Century 21 Admiral's Port, Inc. v. Walker, 471 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (failure to seek leave to amend prior to court's order of dismissal with prejudice, or to seek rehearing requesting leave to amend, precludes consideration of the issue for the first time on appeal); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1980) (burden is generally on appellant to provide sufficient record to demonstrate reversible error).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See § 95.11(3)(o ), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing four-year limitations period in action for assault, battery, false arrest, malicious prosecution, or false imprisonment); § 95.11(4)(g), Fla. Stat. (2016) (providing two-year limitations period in action for libel or slander); Century 21 Admiral's Port, Inc. v. Walker, 471 So.2d 544 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (failure to seek leave to amend prior to court's order of dismissal with prejudice, or to seek rehearing requesting leave to amend, precludes consideration of the issue for the first time on appeal); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So.2d 1150 (Fla. 1980) (burden is generally on appellant to provide sufficient record to demonstrate reversible error).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

252 So. 3d 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nails-v-walmart-fladistctapp-2018.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack