Nails v. Carlyle Group Global
This text of Nails v. Carlyle Group Global (Nails v. Carlyle Group Global) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
ANGELA NAILS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 24-1884 (UNA) ) THE CARLYLE GROUP GLOBAL, et al., ) ) Defendants. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in
forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court grants the application
and, for the reasons discussed below, dismisses the complaint.
Plaintiff, a resident of Savannah, Georgia, see Compl. at 4, alleges that, on November 23,
2022, she sustained an injury while shopping at a Dollar Tree store in an unspecified location,
see generally id. at 1-3. Subsequently, she alleges, she filed a claim, presumably to be handled
by defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., provided supporting documents
upon request, and has received no response to her inquiries as to the status of her claim. See id.
at 1-2.
Plaintiff invokes 18 U.S.C. § 2255, which in relevant part provides:
Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains or liquidated damages in the amount of $150,000, and the cost of the action, including reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. The
1 court may also award punitive damages and such other preliminary and equitable relief as the court determines to be appropriate.
18 U.S.C. § 2255(a). It does not appear that the statute applies in this case. Plaintiff is not
alleged to be a minor, or a victim of any of the enumerated federal criminal statutes, and the
complaint does not demand damages. Thus, the complaint fails to state a claim under 18 U.S.C.
§ 2255, and it will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
2024.07.24 12:03:56 -04'00' DATE: July 24, 2024 TREVOR N. McFADDEN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nails v. Carlyle Group Global, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nails-v-carlyle-group-global-dcd-2024.