Nails v. Carlyle Group Global

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 24, 2024·No. Civil Action No. 2024-1884·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

ANGELA NAILS, )

)

Plaintiff, )

)

v. ) Civil Action No. 24-1884 (UNA)

)

THE CARLYLE GROUP GLOBAL, et al., )

)

Defendants. )

MEMORANDUM OPINION

This matter is before the court on consideration of plaintiff’s application to proceed in

forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and pro se complaint (ECF No. 1). The Court grants the application

and, for the reasons discussed below, dismisses the complaint.

Plaintiff, a resident of Savannah, Georgia, see Compl. at 4, alleges that, on November 23,

2022, she sustained an injury while shopping at a Dollar Tree store in an unspecified location,

see generally id. at 1-3. Subsequently, she alleges, she filed a claim, presumably to be handled

by defendant Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc., provided supporting documents

upon request, and has received no response to her inquiries as to the status of her claim. See id.

at 1-2.

Plaintiff invokes 18 U.S.C. § 2255, which in relevant part provides:

Any person who, while a minor, was a victim of a violation of section 1589, 1590, 1591, 2241(c), 2242, 2243, 2251, 2251A, 2252, 2252A, 2260, 2421, 2422, or 2423 of this title and who suffers personal injury as a result of such violation, regardless of whether the injury occurred while such person was a minor, may sue in any appropriate United States District Court and shall recover the actual damages such person sustains or liquidated damages in the amount of $150,000, and the cost of the action, including reasonable attorney’s fees and other litigation costs reasonably incurred. The

court may also award punitive damages and such other preliminary and equitable relief as the court determines to be appropriate.

18 U.S.C. § 2255(a). It does not appear that the statute applies in this case. Plaintiff is not

alleged to be a minor, or a victim of any of the enumerated federal criminal statutes, and the

complaint does not demand damages. Thus, the complaint fails to state a claim under 18 U.S.C.

§ 2255, and it will be dismissed. A separate order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.

2024.07.24 12:03:56 -04'00'

DATE: July 24, 2024 TREVOR N. McFADDEN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nails v. Carlyle Group Global, (D.D.C. 2024).

Nails v. Carlyle Group Global (Nails v. Carlyle Group Global) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related