Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/NAILON v. State

NAILON v. State

82 So. 3d 1209, 2012 WL 954085, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4481
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 22, 2012
Docket1D11-3964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 82 So. 3d 1209 (NAILON v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
NAILON v. State, 82 So. 3d 1209, 2012 WL 954085, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4481 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

David S. Nailon seeks certiorari review of an order dismissing as untimely his motion for reduction and modification of sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c). As the state properly concedes, petitioner’s motion was in fact timely. Accordingly, the petition for writ of certiorari is GRANTED, the order dismissing petitioner’s rule 3.800(c) motion is QUASHED, and the matter is REMANDED with directions to consider the merits of Nailon’s motion.

PADOVANO, LEWIS, and WETHERELL, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MOMBASA v. State
82 So. 3d 1209 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
82 So. 3d 1209, 2012 WL 954085, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 4481, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nailon-v-state-fladistctapp-2012.