Nailling v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Nailling v. United States

124 F.2d 431, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided December 10, 1941·No. No. 8955·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'

Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

124 F.2d 431 (Nailling v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related