Nailling v. United States

Sixth Circuit

Nailling v. United States

124 F.2d 431, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 10, 1941

DocketNo. 8955

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 124 F.2d 431 (Nailling v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nailling v. United States, 124 F.2d 431, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521 (6th Cir. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This case came on to be heard upon the record, briefs, and argument of counsel ; and it appearing that the only question presented relates to the sufficiency of the evidence, and that no motion was made for a directed verdict at the conclusion of all the evidence; and it appearing that this court will not consider the sufficiency of the evidence unless it is satisfied that there has been a miscarriage of justice (Roney v. United States, 6 Cir., 37 F.2d 341); and it also appearing from the record that the evidence amply supports the verdict and judgment and that no injustice has been done:

It is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the judgment be, and it hereby is, affirmed.'

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 F.2d 431, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2521, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nailling-v-united-states-ca6-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack