Naidus v. State
702 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312, 1997 WL 731484
This text of 702 So. 2d 1324 (Naidus v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Naidus v. State, 702 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312, 1997 WL 731484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. We remand to the trial court with directions to either strike the imposition of restitution, or to grant appellant an eviden-tiary hearing to determine ability to pay. See Filmare v. State, 656 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Filmore v. State
656 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
702 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312, 1997 WL 731484, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naidus-v-state-fladistctapp-1997.