Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Naidus v. State

Naidus v. State

702 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312, 1997 WL 731484
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 26, 1997·No. No. 97-0167·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s conviction and sentence. We remand to the trial court with directions to either strike the imposition of restitution, or to grant appellant an eviden-tiary hearing to determine ability to pay. See Filmare v. State, 656 So.2d 535 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS.

GUNTHER and SHAHOOD, JJ., and RAMIREZ, JUAN, Jr., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naidus v. State, 702 So. 2d 1324, 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 13312, 1997 WL 731484 (Fla. Ct. App. 1997).

702 So. 2d 1324 (Naidus v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Filmore v. State
656 So. 2d 535 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)