Naidech v. U. C. C. of New Jersey
46 A.2d 734, 134 N.J.L. 232, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 156
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Case in the Supreme Court.
*233 For affirmance — The Chancellor, Parker, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Colie, Oliphant, Wells, Rafferty, Dill, Freund, McGeehan, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Naidech v. U. C. C. of New Jersey, 46 A.2d 734, 134 N.J.L. 232, 1946 N.J. LEXIS 156 (N.J. 1946).
46 A.2d 734 (Naidech v. U. C. C. of New Jersey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Barratt v. Cushman & Wakefield of New Jersey, Inc.
675 A.2d 1094 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1996)
Felice v. Felice
112 A.2d 581 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Hillside Holding Corp. v. Div. of Employment SEC.
107 A.2d 717 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Paramus Bathing Beach, Inc. v. Div. of Employment SEC.
105 A.2d 860 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1954)
Neustadter v. United Exposition Service Co.
82 A.2d 476 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Cohen v. District Unemployment Compensation Board
167 F.2d 883 (D.C. Circuit, 1948)