Nahrgang v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 685, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1713
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedNovember 22, 1966
DocketR.D. 11239; Entry Nos. 020896; 03656
StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 685 (Nahrgang v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nahrgang v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 685, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1713 (cusc 1966).

Opinion

Watson, Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the respective parties herein:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the respective parties hereto, subject to the approval of the Court, that the merchandise involved herein consists of Tufftride No. 1 and Tufftride No. 2, mixtures of sodium and potassium cyanide, exported from West Germany during the period from 1960 to date; that the said preparations are not on the final list published by the Secretary of the Treasury in T.D. 54521.
[686]*686IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties hereto that the said merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value as that value is defined in Section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the export value, as defined, supra, is the invoice unit value, net, packed, Jess 12% percent discount.
IT IS FURTHER STIPULATED AND AGREED that the appeals to reappraisement enumerated above may be submitted on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts, I find and hold export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956, T.D. 54165, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the merchandise here involved, and that such value in each case, is the unit invoice value, net, packed, less 12% percent discount.

Judgment will issue accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
57 Cust. Ct. 685, 1966 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1713, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nahrgang-v-united-states-cusc-1966.