Nagy v. Obama
This text of 360 F. App'x 164 (Nagy v. Obama) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[165]*165 JUDGMENT
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, the brief filed by appellant, and the motion to expedite. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2); D.C.Cir. Rule 34(j). It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s order dated August 7, 2009, be affirmed, as appellant’s tort claim is frivolous. It is
FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to expedite be dismissed as moot.
Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition will not be published. The Clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after resolution of any timely petition for rehearing or petition for rehearing en banc. See Fed. R.App. P. 41(b); D.C.Cir. Rule 41.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
360 F. App'x 164, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagy-v-obama-cadc-2010.