Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2005·No. 03-15955·Published

Opinion

FILED FOR PUBLICATION JUN 28 2005

CATHY A. CATTERSON, CLERK UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CONNIE A. NAGRAMPA, No. 03-15955

Plaintiff - Appellant, D.C. No. CV-03-00208-MJJ

v. ORDER MAILCOUPS INC.; THE AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Before: SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this

court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit

Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to

this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by

the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc, (9th Cir. 2005).

Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc (Nagrampa v. Mailcoups Inc) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.