Nagler v. McCrory Stores Corp.

Third Circuit

Nagler v. McCrory Stores Corp.

210 F.2d 469, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 334, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMarch 2, 1954

Docket11215

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 210 F.2d 469 (Nagler v. McCrory Stores Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nagler v. McCrory Stores Corp., 210 F.2d 469, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 334, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588 (3d Cir. 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in a civil action for unfair competition. To support the granting of such extraordinary relief there must be a showing of irreparable injury during the penden-cy of the action. Murray Hill Restaurant v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, 3 Cir., 1938, 98 F.2d 578. Here, as the district court properly found, there was no proof of irreparable injury. It follows that the court did not err in denying the preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiff.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiff from an order of the district court denying his motion for a preliminary injunction in a civil action for unfair competition. To support the granting of such extraordinary relief there must be a showing of irreparable injury during the penden-cy of the action. Murray Hill Restaurant v. Thirteen Twenty One Locust, 3 Cir., 1938, 98 F.2d 578. Here, as the district court properly found, there was no proof of irreparable injury. It follows that the court did not err in denying the preliminary injunction sought by the plaintiff.

The order of the district court will be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 F.2d 469, 100 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 334, 1954 U.S. App. LEXIS 4588, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagler-v-mccrory-stores-corp-ca3-1954.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack