Nagle v. Sykes

138 A. 58, 106 Conn. 731, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 174
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 28, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 138 A. 58 (Nagle v. Sykes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nagle v. Sykes, 138 A. 58, 106 Conn. 731, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 174 (Colo. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

No conclusions other than those reached by the trial court would have been justified upon the subordinate facts found. These were made upon conflicting evidence; it was for the trial court to determine the credibility of the witnesses’ statements. The attempt to substitute the draft-finding for the finding, by way of a motion to correct, fails in this instance, as it has done heretofore. Our court has never within our experience made up an entire finding without evidence, or contrary to admitted or undisputed facts. The further correction of the finding claimed, by striking out nine of its paragraphs, is not well taken; none of these were found without evidence.

There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
138 A. 58, 106 Conn. 731, 1927 Conn. LEXIS 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagle-v-sykes-conn-1927.