Nagle v. Shearson Lehman Bros.

190 A.D.2d 568, 593 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 9, 1993
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 190 A.D.2d 568 (Nagle v. Shearson Lehman Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nagle v. Shearson Lehman Bros., 190 A.D.2d 568, 593 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Beverly S. Cohen, J.), entered March 26, 1991, which, inter alia, granted defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff’s first cause of action, sounding in breach of contract, was properly dismissed as the documentary evidence demonstrates that the proposed employment relationship was one that was "at will,” and thus terminable by either party at any time for any reason or no reason (see, Wieder v Skala, 80 NY2d 628, 633). Nor does the documentary evidence support a claim for a bonus payment as said payment was contingent [569]*569upon plaintiffs “good standing” in defendant’s employ, a condition which did not occur, as plaintiff never commenced work with defendant. The court properly dismissed plaintiffs second cause of action sounding in fraud. Plaintiffs claim that defendant never intended to employ him as a managing director is essentially a restatement of his first cause of action for breach of contract (Chase v United Hosp., 60 AD2d 558, 559).

We have considered plaintiffs remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Concur — Carro, J. P., Ellerin, Ross and Asch, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minovici v. Belkin BV
109 A.D.3d 520 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2013)
Country Pointe at Dix Hills Home Owners Ass'n v. Beechwood Organization
80 A.D.3d 643 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Tannehill v. Paul Stuart, Inc.
226 A.D.2d 117 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Elite Investigations, Ltd. v. St. Regis Hotel Joint Venture
197 A.D.2d 456 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
190 A.D.2d 568, 593 N.Y.S.2d 231, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1054, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagle-v-shearson-lehman-bros-nyappdiv-1993.