Naghtin v. Jones ex rel. Jones

629 So. 2d 1109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 176, 1994 WL 11622
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 20, 1994·No. No. 92-1854·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Among the issues raised in this appeal of a negligence action is appellants’ contention that the trial court abused its discretion in denying appellants’ motion to dismiss a co-defendant, Ephesus Junior Academy, after it had settled or, in the alternative, to disclose the settlement agreement to the jury. Pursuant to the decision of the Florida Supreme Court in Dosdourian v. Carsten, 624 So.2d 241 (Fla.1993), we find that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to dismiss the Academy after it had settled, but that the trial court did abuse its discretion in failing to disclose the settlement agreement to the jury. Id. at 247-8. Accordingly, we must vacate the judgment rendered and remand the ease for a new trial. We find it unnecessary to address any of the other issues raised on appeal.

VACATED and REMANDED for new trial.

JOANOS, MINER and KAHN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naghtin v. Jones ex rel. Jones, 629 So. 2d 1109, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 176, 1994 WL 11622 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

629 So. 2d 1109 (Naghtin v. Jones ex rel. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Packaging Corp. of America v. DeRycke
49 So. 3d 286 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2010)
Naghtin v. Jones by and Through Jones
680 So. 2d 573 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)