Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd.

District Court, S.D. California·Decided October 27, 2021·No. 3:20-cv-01723·Unknown

Opinion

DR. MORTEZA NAGHAVI, M.D., an Case No.: 3:20-cv-01723-H-KSC individual; MEDITEX CAPITAL, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company; and ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT AMERICAN HEART BELTER HEALTH MEASUREMENT TECHNOLOGIES, LLC, a Delaware AND ANALYSIS TECHNOLOGY limited liability company, CO., LTD. TO OBTAIN Plaintiffs,

v. BELTER HEALTH MEASUREMENT LTD., a China corporation; ZHUHAI HENGQIN XUANYUAN NO. 8 PARTNERSHIP (LIMITED PARTNERSHIP), a China limited partnership; and DOES 1 through 20, inclusive,

Defendants. On September 8, 2021, the law firm of Paul Hastings LLP and its current and former attorneys, Peter M. Stone, Danli C. Guo, and Kevin J. White (collectively, “Paul Hastings”), filed a motion to withdraw as counsel of record for Defendant Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. (‘Defendant’). (Doc. No. 38.) Paul Hastings seeks withdrawal on the basis that Defendant allegedly (1) failed to pay its existing legal fees, (11) is no longer willing to pay for the future fees expected in this case, (111) has consented to the withdrawal, and (iv) has ceased communications with counsel. (Doc. No. at 2; Doc. No. 38-2, Decl. of Peter M. Stone Jf 3, 5, 7-9.) Since Defendant is a corporation, it must be represented by counsel in order to appear this action. “It is well established that corporations may appear in federal court only through licensed counsel.” Foley v. Allied Interstate, Inc., 312 F. Supp. 2d 1279, 1283 (C.D. Cal. 2004) (citing In re Highley, 459 F.2d 554, 555 (9th Cir. 1972)); see also Civ. 83.3G) ([C]orporations, partnerships and other legal entities, may appear in court through an attorney’). Paul Hastings states that it informed the Defendant of its obligation to retain counsel to proceed in this litigation. (Doc. No. 38-1 at 3.) However, Defendant has not moved to substitute counsel or otherwise indicated that it has retained counsel to replace Paul Hastings. Paul Hastings must use their best efforts to encourage cooperation from their clients. Defendant is directed to obtain substitute counsel within 30 days of the issuance of this order. Defendant is advised that failure to retain counsel risks default judgment. See U.S. High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993); Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 55(a). In light of this order, the Court vacates the hearing scheduled for November 1, at 10:30 AM concerning the motion to withdraw. If Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. fails to comply with this order, it may face sanctions for failing to comply with a court order. Sanctions may include monetary sanctions or default in this case. The Court orders Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. to obtain new counsel to protect its interests in this litigation. DATED: October 27, 2021 - —Malgn Lthep fe MARILYN ELE. HUFF, District Judge UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd., (S.D. Cal. 2021).

Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd. (Naghavi v. Belter Health Measurement and Analysis Technology Co., Ltd.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Highley v. Rothman
459 F.2d 554 (Ninth Circuit, 1972)
Foley v. Allied Interstate, Inc.
312 F. Supp. 2d 1279 (C.D. California, 2004)