Nagel v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Nagel v. State

763 So. 2d 319, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 598, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1453, 2000 WL 963899

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 13, 2000·No. No. SC96900·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Nagel v. State, 789 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), because it cited as controlling authority Goodwin v. State, 721 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings in light of our opinion in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999).

It is so ordered.

SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have for review Nagel v. State, 789 So.2d 1242 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999), because it cited as controlling authority Goodwin v. State, 721 So.2d 728 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), approved in part, disapproved in part, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999). We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.; Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 420 (Fla.1981). We quash the decision below and remand for further proceedings in light of our opinion in Goodwin v. State, 751 So.2d 537 (Fla.1999).

It is so ordered.

SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS and QUINCE, JJ., concur. WELLS, C.J., dissents.

Nagel v. State, 763 So. 2d 319, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 598, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 1453, 2000 WL 963899 (Fla. 2000).

Pincite

763 So. 2d 319 (Nagel v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related