Nagel v. Iowa

Supreme Court

Nagel v. Iowa

254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1270

CourtSupreme Court of the United States

DecidedJanuary 24, 1921

DocketNo. 150

StatusPublished

This text of 254 U.S. 620 (Nagel v. Iowa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nagel v. Iowa, 254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1270 (1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. Submitted January 18,1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. W. D. Milligan for plaintiff in error. Mr. Horace M. Hamer and Mr. Freeman C. Davidson for defendant in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Error to the Supreme Court of the State of Iowa. Submitted January 18,1921. Decided January 24, 1921. Per Curiam. Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6,1916, c. 448, § 2, 39 Stat. 726; Jett Bros. Distilling Co. v. Carrollton, 252 U. S. 1. Mr. W. D. Milligan for plaintiff in error. Mr. Horace M. Hamer and Mr. Freeman C. Davidson for defendant in error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

254 U.S. 620, 41 S. Ct. 319, 65 L. Ed. 442, 1921 U.S. LEXIS 1270, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagel-v-iowa-scotus-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack