Nagel v. Guittar

17 N.W. 671, 62 Iowa 510
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedDecember 13, 1883
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 17 N.W. 671 (Nagel v. Guittar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nagel v. Guittar, 17 N.W. 671, 62 Iowa 510 (iowa 1883).

Opinion

Beck, J.

The only objection raised by the assignment of plaintiff’s counsel is based upon the ground that the judgment of the circuit court is in conflict with the evidence.

An amended abstract filed by defendant, which is not denied by plaintiff, shows that no exceptions were taken to the judgment at the time it was rendered, nor until twenty-four days thereafter. Exceptions to a decision must be taken at the time it is made, (Code, § 2831,) except in the case of instructions to the jury, which may be excepted to within three days after the verdict. Code, § 2789. Neither does it appear [511]*511that a motion for a new trial was made. We cannot disregard this statute, and review a decision not excepted to at the time therein required. See Joliet Iron & Steel Co. v. The C., C. & W. R'y Co., 50 Iowa, 455. The decision of the circuit court must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Souster v. Black
54 N.W. 534 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
17 N.W. 671, 62 Iowa 510, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagel-v-guittar-iowa-1883.