Nagel v. Adler
10 Misc. 787
This text of 10 Misc. 787 (Nagel v. Adler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Nagel v. Adler, 10 Misc. 787 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).
Opinion
This trial involved a question of fact which was fairly submitted under proper instructions.
[788]*788The jury having found on the facts against the defendants and on conflicting evidence we see no reason to disturb the same.
J udgment is, therefore, affirmed, with costs.
Ehblioh, Oh. J., and Van Wyck, J., concur.
■ Judgment affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
10 Misc. 787, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagel-v-adler-nynyccityct-1894.