Nagara Trading Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Nagara Trading Co. v. United States

49 Cust. Ct. 310, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 882

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedNovember 27, 1962

DocketNo. 67217; protests 61/8874, 61/8875, and 61/9008 (Los Angeles)

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Cust. Ct. 310 (Nagara Trading Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nagara Trading Co. v. United States, 49 Cust. Ct. 310, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 882 (cusc 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that said section 501 was not complied with by the collector, in that no notice of appraisement had been issued, the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)). United States v. James H. Rhodes & Co. (40 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 488), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Richardson, J.

In accordance with oral stipulation of counsel that said section 501 was not complied with by the collector, in that no notice of appraisement had been issued, the matter was remanded to a single judge sitting in reappraisement for determination of the value of the merchandise in the manner provided by law (28 U.S.C. § 2636(d)). United States v. James H. Rhodes & Co. (40 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 488), followed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 Cust. Ct. 310, 1962 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 882, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nagara-trading-co-v-united-states-cusc-1962.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack