Home/Second Circuit/Nafziger v. Blum

Nafziger v. Blum

695 F.2d 668
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit
DecidedDecember 14, 1982
DocketNos. 451, 552, Dockets 82-7500, 82-7550
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 695 F.2d 668 (Nafziger v. Blum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nafziger v. Blum, 695 F.2d 668 (2d Cir. 1982).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The Memorandum-Decision and Order of the District Court, 551 F.Supp. 705, is hereby affirmed, substantially for the reasons given by Judge McCurn in his opinion dated June 2, 1982.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lori Nafziger, Individually, on Behalf of Her Dependent Son and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Barbara Blum, Individually and in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the New York State Department of Social Services and S. Jean Wagoner, Individually and in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Jefferson County Department of Social Services, Angela Curry, on Behalf of Herself and Her Minor Dependent Child and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Barbara Blum, Individually and in Her Official Capacity as Commissioner, New York State Department of Social Services and Michael Nassar, Individually and in His Capacity as Commissioner, Oneida County Department of Social Services
695 F.2d 668 (Second Circuit, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
695 F.2d 668, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nafziger-v-blum-ca2-1982.