Naftone International Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Naftone International Corp. v. United States

54 Cust. Ct. 295, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2226

United States Customs Court·Decided January 7, 1965·No. No. 68992; protest 62/2621 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “Projector Sonector 8,” consists of parts of the Sonector 8, which takes the sound of film and amplifies it, and that said merchandise is a part or parts of a tape recorder, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), followed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Nichols, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise, described on the invoice as “Projector Sonector 8,” consists of parts of the Sonector 8, which takes the sound of film and amplifies it, and that said merchandise is a part or parts of a tape recorder, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained. Electric & Musical Industries (US), Ltd. v. United States (42 Cust. Ct. 87, C.D. 2070), followed.

Naftone International Corp. v. United States, 54 Cust. Ct. 295, 1965 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 2226 (cusc 1965).

Pincite

54 Cust. Ct. 295 (Naftone International Corp. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related