Naftone International Corp. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Naftone International Corp. v. United States

46 Cust. Ct. 552

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 29, 1960

DocketReap. Dec. 9885; Entry No. 796936

StatusPublished

This text of 46 Cust. Ct. 552 (Naftone International Corp. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naftone International Corp. v. United States, 46 Cust. Ct. 552 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been limited, under the terms of a written stipulation of submission, to certain cameras, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked “WE,” which were exported from West Germany and entered at the port of New York.

The agreed set of facts, upon which the case is before me, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is deutsche marks 238 each, less 46.82 per centum, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oliver, Chief Judge:

This appeal for reappraisement has been limited, under the terms of a written stipulation of submission, to certain cameras, represented by the invoice items marked “A” and checked “WE,” which were exported from West Germany and entered at the port of New York.

The agreed set of facts, upon which the case is before me, establishes that the proper basis for appraisement of the merchandise in question, as hereinabove identified, is cost of production, as defined in section 402(f) of the Tariff Act of 1930, and that such statutory value therefor is deutsche marks 238 each, less 46.82 per centum, packed, and I so hold.

Judgment will be rendered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

46 Cust. Ct. 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naftone-international-corp-v-united-states-cusc-1960.