Naftone, Inc. v. United States

45 Cust. Ct. 227

United States Customs Court·Decided July 29, 1960·No. No. 64418; protest 59/28050 (New York)·Published

Opinion

Opinion by

Mollison, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise described on the invoice as “Synthetic Iron Oxide 140-SO” was actually entered after the rate had been reduced by T.D. 52739, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naftone, Inc. v. United States, 45 Cust. Ct. 227 (cusc 1960).

Pincite

45 Cust. Ct. 227 (Naftone, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.