Naffky v. Yosovitz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Naffky v. Yosovitz

243 A.D. 851

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 15, 1935·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that there is no showing of negligence on the part of the defendant. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action, The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Thompson and Lewis, JJ., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and for granting a new trial on the ground that there is no showing of negligence on the part of the defendant. (The judgment awards plaintiff damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action, The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Sears, P. J., Taylor, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Naffky v. Yosovitz, 243 A.D. 851 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

Pincite

243 A.D. 851 (Naffky v. Yosovitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.