Naeser v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Naeser v. State

257 So. 3d 1090

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 21, 2018·No. No. 4D18-803·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Gethers v. State , 838 So.2d 504, 505 (Fla. 2003) ("[A]bsent the execution of an arrest warrant, a defendant who is in jail in a specific county pursuant to an arrest on one or more charges need not be given credit for time served in that county on charges in another county when the second county has only lodged a detainer against the defendant.").

Gerber, C.J., Warner and Forst, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Affirmed. See Gethers v. State , 838 So.2d 504, 505 (Fla. 2003) ("[A]bsent the execution of an arrest warrant, a defendant who is in jail in a specific county pursuant to an arrest on one or more charges need not be given credit for time served in that county on charges in another county when the second county has only lodged a detainer against the defendant.").

Gerber, C.J., Warner and Forst, JJ., concur.

Naeser v. State, 257 So. 3d 1090 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

257 So. 3d 1090 (Naeser v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related