Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company
This text of Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162077 & (62) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh NAEL HAYDAW, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
and PRIORITY PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, LLC, and MICHIGAN PAIN MANAGEMENT, PLLC, Intervening Plaintiffs, v SC: 162077 COA: 345516 Wayne CC: 16-012992-NF FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The Insurance Alliance of Michigan’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is DENIED as moot.
ZAHRA and CLEMENT, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. June 2, 2021 b0526 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nael-haydaw-v-farm-bureau-insurance-company-mich-2021.