Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company
Opinion
Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan
June 2, 2021 Bridget M. McCormack, Chief Justice
162077 & (62) Brian K. Zahra David F. Viviano
Richard H. Bernstein Elizabeth T. Clement Megan K. Cavanagh
NAEL HAYDAW, Elizabeth M. Welch, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices
and PRIORITY PHYSICAL THERAPY AND REHABILITATION, LLC, and MICHIGAN PAIN MANAGEMENT, PLLC, Intervening Plaintiffs,
v SC: 162077 COA: 345516 Wayne CC: 16-012992-NF
FARM BUREAU INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant.
_________________________________________/
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the July 9, 2020 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court. The Insurance Alliance of Michigan’s motion for leave to file an amicus curiae brief is DENIED as moot.
ZAHRA and CLEMENT, JJ., would grant leave to appeal.
I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court.
June 2, 2021
b0526 Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company (Nael Haydaw v. Farm Bureau Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.