Naeher v. Board of County Commissioners
92 P. 1135, 77 Kan. 849, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 210
Opinion
This case involves the question whether a county attorney may maintain an action in the name of the board of county commissioners to recover fees alleged to have been paid to a former county officer in excess of those authorized by law. The question was determined in Kerby v. Clay County, 71 Kan. 683, 81 Pac. 503, and following the rule in that case the judg-' ment of the district court is reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Naeher v. Board of County Commissioners, 92 P. 1135, 77 Kan. 849, 1907 Kan. LEXIS 210 (kan 1907).
92 P. 1135 (Naeher v. Board of County Commissioners) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Benn v. Slaymaker
143 P. 503 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1914)
Royal Salt Co. v. Board of County Commissioners
107 P. 640 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1910)