Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson

442 S.E.2d 32, 336 N.C. 66, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 172

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided April 8, 1994·No. No. 455A93·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the summary judgment for the petitioner entered by the Superior Court, Wake County, is reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for the entry of summary judgment for the respondent.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the summary judgment for the petitioner entered by the Superior Court, Wake County, is reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for the entry of summary judgment for the respondent.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson, 442 S.E.2d 32, 336 N.C. 66, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 172 (N.C. 1994).

Pincite

442 S.E.2d 32 (Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related