Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson

442 S.E.2d 32, 336 N.C. 66, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 172

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedApril 8, 1994

DocketNo. 455A93

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 442 S.E.2d 32 (Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Naegele Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Harrelson, 442 S.E.2d 32, 336 N.C. 66, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 172 (N.C. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the summary judgment for the petitioner entered by the Superior Court, Wake County, is reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for the entry of summary judgment for the respondent.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion for the Court of Appeals by Greene, J., the decision of the Court of Appeals, which affirmed the summary judgment for the petitioner entered by the Superior Court, Wake County, is reversed. The cause is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Wake County, for the entry of summary judgment for the respondent.

REVERSED AND REMANDED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

442 S.E.2d 32, 336 N.C. 66, 1994 N.C. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/naegele-outdoor-advertising-inc-v-harrelson-nc-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack