Nadler v. Baker
144 A.D. 941
Opinion
Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, on the authority of Smith & Sons Carpet Co. v. Ball (137 App. Div. 100) and Heim v. New York Stock Exchange (138 id. 96). Jenks, P. J., Hirsehberg, Burr, Thomas and Carr,. JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nadler v. Baker, 144 A.D. 941 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).
144 A.D. 941 (Nadler v. Baker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Smith v. Ball
137 A.D. 100 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1910)