Nadja Sahliger Schep v. Resolution Trust Corporation
This text of 53 F.3d 1085 (Nadja Sahliger Schep v. Resolution Trust Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
53 F.3d 1085
Nadja Sahliger SCHEP, Petitioner,
v.
RESOLUTION TRUST CORPORATION, Respondent.
No. 93-70905.
United States Court of Appeals,
Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted May 4, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.
Thomas A. McWatters III, James M. Harris, Sidley & Austin, Los Angeles, CA, for petitioner.
Roy A. Jeys, Wilson & Becks and Constance G. Brigham, Los Angeles, CA, and Mitchell E. Plave, Washington, DC, for respondent.
On Petition for Review of a Decision of the Resolution Trust Corporation.
Before BEEZER and TROTT, Circuit Judges and SHUBB*, District Judge.
ORDER
We conclude that we lack jurisdiction over this petition for the reasons set forth in Massachusetts v. FDIC, 47 F.3d 456 (1st Cir.1995). The petition is transferred to the United States District Court for the Central District of California for further proceedings. 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1631.
The Honorable William B. Shubb, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of California, sitting by designation
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
53 F.3d 1085, 95 Daily Journal DAR 6313, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 3653, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11194, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadja-sahliger-schep-v-resolution-trust-corporation-ca9-1995.