Nading v. State
This text of 491 S.W.2d 129 (Nading v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION
This appeal is from a conviction for the offense of robbery by firearms with the punishment being assessed at seven years.
On May 3, 1972, the appellant waived his right to a trial by jury and entered a plea of guilty to the offense before the court.
On appeal his sole contention is that “The trial court abused its discretion in denying the appellant’s application for probation.”
[130]*130Such contention is overruled. It rests within the sound discretion of the trial court as to whether probation should be granted and such decision is not appeala-ble. E. g. Trautschold v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 466 S.W.2d 586.
No motion for rehearing will be filed by the Clerk except by leave of this Court upon a showing of good cause.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
491 S.W.2d 129, 1973 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nading-v-state-texcrimapp-1973.