Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA. Read the opinion of the Court — 937 F.3d 164
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·Decided October 3, 2018·No. 15-3047·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT

No. 15-3047

NADINE PELLEGRINO; HARRY WALDMAN,

Appellants

v.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA TRANSPORTATION SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Div. of Dept. of Homeland Security; TSA TSO NUYRIAH ABDUL-MALIK, Sued in her individual capacity;

TSA STSO LAURA LABBEE, Sued in her individual capacity; TSA TSO DENICE KISSINGER, Sued in her individual capacity;

JOHN/JANE DOE TSA Aviations Security Inspector defendants sued in their individual capacities;

JOHN/JANE DOE TSA, Official Defendants, sued in their individual capacities

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania District Court No. 2-09-cv-05505 District Judge: The Honorable J. Curtis Joyner

ORDER SUR PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

Present: SMITH, Chief Judge, McKEE, AMBRO, CHAGARES, JORDAN, HARDIMAN, GREENAWAY, JR., VANASKIE, SHWARTZ, KRAUSE, RESTREPO, BIBAS, and SCIRICA, Circuit Judges

 As to panel rehearing only; will participate as a member of the en banc court pursuant to 3d. Cir. I.O.P. 9.6.4.

A majority of the active judges having voted for rehearing en banc in the above captioned cases, it is ordered that the petition for rehearing is GRANTED. The Clerk of this Court shall list the case for rehearing en banc on February 20, 2019. The opinion and judgment entered July 11, 2018 are hereby vacated.

BY THE COURT,

s/ D. Brooks Smith Chief Judge

Dated: October 3, 2018

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA, (3d Cir. 2018).

Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA (Nadine Pellegrino v. TSA) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.