Nadine Marie Jackson-Rone v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
This text of Nadine Marie Jackson-Rone v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. (Nadine Marie Jackson-Rone v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ October 01, 2014
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A15D0062. NADINE MARIE JACKSON-RONE v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. et al.
Nadine Jackson-Rone filed suit against JP Morgan Chase Bank and Johnson & Freedman, LLC, alleging, inter alia, a quiet title claim. After the trial court dismissed the complaint, Jackson-Rone filed an application for discretionary appeal in this Court. The Supreme Court, however, has original appellate jurisdiction over cases involving title to land. See Ga. Const. of 1983, Art. VI, Sec. VI, Par. III (1). Because this appeal involves title to land, jurisdiction appears to lie in the Supreme Court. See Tharp v. Harpagon Co., 278 Ga. 654, 655 (1) (604 SE2d 156) (2004). Accordingly, this application is hereby TRANSFERRED to the Supreme Court for disposition.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 10/01/2014 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nadine Marie Jackson-Rone v. Jp Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadine-marie-jackson-rone-v-jp-morgan-chase-bank-n-gactapp-2014.