Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University

Michigan Supreme Court

Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University

DecidedMarch 5, 2018

Docket155782

StatusPublished

This text of Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University (Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University, (Mich. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 5, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

155782 & (57) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein NADIA SHUAYTO, Kurtis T. Wilder Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices v SC: 155782 COA: 329520 Oakland CC: 2014-139389-CD LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BAHMAN MIRSHAB, and MARIA VAZ, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion of the Arab American Chamber of Commerce, the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services, the Arab American Civil Rights League, and the Arab American News to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on December 27, 2017 is accepted for filing. The application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 5, 2018 t0226 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

March 5, 2018 Stephen J. Markman, Chief Justice

155782 & (57) Brian K. Zahra Bridget M. McCormack David F. Viviano Richard H. Bernstein NADIA SHUAYTO, Kurtis T. Wilder Plaintiff-Appellant, Elizabeth T. Clement, Justices v SC: 155782 COA: 329520 Oakland CC: 2014-139389-CD LAWRENCE TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY, BAHMAN MIRSHAB, and MARIA VAZ, Defendants-Appellees.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the motion of the Arab American Chamber of Commerce, the Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services, the Arab American Civil Rights League, and the Arab American News to file a brief amicus curiae is GRANTED. The amicus brief submitted on December 27, 2017 is accepted for filing. The application for leave to appeal the November 29, 2016 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.

I, Larry S. Royster, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. March 5, 2018 t0226 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Nadia Shuayto v. Lawrence Technological University, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadia-shuayto-v-lawrence-technological-university-mich-2018.