Nader v. Connor

Fifth Circuit

Nader v. Connor

388 F.3d 137, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841, 2004 WL 2239033

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 6, 2004·No. 04-50901·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court’s decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex.2004), we AFFIRM that court’s final judgment declar *138 ing the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court’s decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex.2004), we AFFIRM that court’s final judgment declar *138 ing the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.

AFFIRMED.

Nader v. Connor, 388 F.3d 137, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841, 2004 WL 2239033 (5th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

388 F.3d 137 (Nader v. Connor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related