Nader v. Connor

388 F.3d 137, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841, 2004 WL 2239033
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedOctober 6, 2004
Docket04-50901
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 388 F.3d 137 (Nader v. Connor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nader v. Connor, 388 F.3d 137, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841, 2004 WL 2239033 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Plaintiffs-Appellants Ralph Nader, et al., appeal from the district court’s decision denying their First and Fourteenth Amendment constitutional challenges to the Texas Election Code, specifically sections 192.32(a), 192.32(b)(3)(A), 192.32(c), and 192.32(d). Essentially for the reasons as well stated in the district court’s memorandum opinion, Nader v. Connor, 332 F.Supp.2d 982 (W.D.Tex.2004), we AFFIRM that court’s final judgment declar *138 ing the challenged Texas Election Code provisions legal and constitutional.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Miller v. Doe
W.D. Texas, 2022
Fagin v. Abbott
W.D. Texas, 2020
Faas v. Cascos
225 F. Supp. 3d 604 (S.D. Texas, 2016)
Duncan v. Husted
125 F. Supp. 3d 674 (S.D. Ohio, 2015)
Parker v. Duran
180 F. Supp. 3d 851 (D. New Mexico, 2015)
Nader v. Cronin
620 F.3d 1214 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)
Strayhorn v. Williams
430 F. Supp. 2d 661 (W.D. Texas, 2006)
Nader v. Connor, Secretary of State of Texas
544 U.S. 921 (Supreme Court, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
388 F.3d 137, 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 20841, 2004 WL 2239033, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nader-v-connor-ca5-2004.