Nadel v. Zlotogura

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nadel v. Zlotogura

239 A.D. 847

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1933

StatusPublished

This text of 239 A.D. 847 (Nadel v. Zlotogura) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nadel v. Zlotogura, 239 A.D. 847 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, upon .the ground that the admission of plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 in evidence was prejudicial error. We are of opinion that this exhibit, despite the claim that its purpose was to show the dimensions of the haE with reference to the location of the hole in the floor, had for its only purpose an exhibition of subsequent repairs. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment reversed on the law and a new trial granted, costs to appellants to abide the event, upon .the ground that the admission of plaintiff’s Exhibit 3 in evidence was prejudicial error. We are of opinion that this exhibit, despite the claim that its purpose was to show the dimensions of the haE with reference to the location of the hole in the floor, had for its only purpose an exhibition of subsequent repairs. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

239 A.D. 847, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadel-v-zlotogura-nyappdiv-1933.