Nadel v. Hilly-Brook Holding Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Nadel v. Hilly-Brook Holding Corp.

2 A.D.2d 683, 153 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5136

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 4, 1956

StatusPublished

This text of 2 A.D.2d 683 (Nadel v. Hilly-Brook Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nadel v. Hilly-Brook Holding Corp., 2 A.D.2d 683, 153 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5136 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action by a vendee to compel specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property, the vendor interposed a counterclaim which alleges impossibility of performance and asks for a declaration that the contract is null and void on that ground, upon payment to the vendee of the cost of title examination. The appeal is from so much of an order as denies appellant’s motion for summary judgment striking out the answer and dismissing the counterclaim and grants respondent’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment on the counterclaim, and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment, insofar as appeal is taken, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present-—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See post, p. 811.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action by a vendee to compel specific performance of a contract for the purchase and sale of real property, the vendor interposed a counterclaim which alleges impossibility of performance and asks for a declaration that the contract is null and void on that ground, upon payment to the vendee of the cost of title examination. The appeal is from so much of an order as denies appellant’s motion for summary judgment striking out the answer and dismissing the counterclaim and grants respondent’s cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granting judgment on the counterclaim, and from the judgment entered thereon. Order and judgment, insofar as appeal is taken, unanimously affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present-—Wenzel, Acting P. J., Murphy, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ. [See post, p. 811.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 A.D.2d 683, 153 N.Y.S.2d 587, 1956 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadel-v-hilly-brook-holding-corp-nyappdiv-1956.