Nadel v. Gross
This text of 523 So. 2d 1279 (Nadel v. Gross) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We reverse the trial court’s dismissal of Count I of the complaint alleging fraud on the part of appellees. We find that count properly tracked the elements of fraudulent conduct in setting out the claim and stated facts with sufficient specificity. Peninsular Fla. Dist. Council of Assemblies of God v. Pan Am. Inv., 450 So.2d 1231 (Fla. 4th DCA 1984). We affirm the dismissal of Counts II and III for failure to state a cause of action. Connolly v. Sebeco, Inc., 89 So.2d 482 (Fla.1956); First Church of Christ Scientist v. City of St. Petersburg, 344 So.2d 1302 (Fla. 2d DCA 1977).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
523 So. 2d 1279, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 1069, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 1754, 1988 WL 40516, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadel-v-gross-fladistctapp-1988.