Nadel v. Breitfeld

188 A.D.2d 645, 592 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14619
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 28, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful termination of the plaintiffs’ lease, the defendant Lawrence E. Breitfeld appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Durante, J.), entered November 2, 1990, which denied his motion to vacate a default judgment previously entered in favor of the plaintiff.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.

Given the repeated neglect on the part of the appellant’s attorney, the court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in denying the appellant’s motion to vacate the default judgment (see, CPLR 5015 [a] [1]; Chery v Anthony, 156 AD2d 414; Singer v Singer, 136 AD2d 695; Cobbs v Run Tr., Ill AD2d 363). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nadel v. Breitfeld, 188 A.D.2d 645, 592 N.Y.S.2d 261, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14619 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

188 A.D.2d 645 (Nadel v. Breitfeld) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Fleming v. Beckerman
237 A.D.2d 561 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)