Nadel & Associates v. O'Neil

50 A.D.3d 358, 854 N.Y.S.2d 724

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered March 5, 2007, which, to the extent appealed from as limited by the briefs, granted the petition to vacate an arbitration award, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The arbitrator’s notice of hearing was sent to the law firm’s former business address, despite the firm’s timely notification of a change of address. No evidence was offered that the notice was sent by registered or certified mail, as required by CPLR 7506 (b). Upon being notified of the hearing at the time of its commencement, the firm requested adjournment of approximately 30 minutes so it could appear, but the request was denied, resulting in foreclosure of its presentation of pertinent and material evidence. This constituted an abuse of discretion and misconduct within the meaning of CPLR 7511 (b) (1) (i) (Matter of Bevona [Superior Maintenance Co.], 204 AD2d 136, 139 [1994]). Concur—Tom, J.P., Saxe, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nadel & Associates v. O'Neil, 50 A.D.3d 358, 854 N.Y.S.2d 724 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

50 A.D.3d 358 (Nadel & Associates v. O'Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In re Arbitration between Bevona & Superior Maintenance Co.
204 A.D.2d 136 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)