Nadege Odena Jacob v. Franklin Hospital Medical Center
This text of Nadege Odena Jacob v. Franklin Hospital Medical Center (Nadege Odena Jacob v. Franklin Hospital Medical Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
State of New York Court of Appeals This memorandum is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the New York Reports.
No. 47 SSM 7 Nadege Odena Jacob, &c., Appellant, v. Franklin Hospital Medical Center, et al., Respondents.
Submitted by Edward D. Tantleff, for appellant. Submitted by Daniel S. Ratner, for respondent Franklin Hospital Medical Center. Submitted by Tracy Solomon, for respondents Abdul Majeed et al.
On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules, order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with costs. In response to the prima facie showing of entitlement to summary judgment by defendants Franklin Hospital Medical Center, Abdul Majeed and AM Pulmonary Care, P.C., plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Mazella v Beals, 27 NY3d 694 [2016]; Alvarez v Prospect Hosp., 68 NY2d 320, 324-325 [1986]). Chief Judge DiFiore and Judges Rivera, Stein, Fahey, Garcia and Wilson concur.
Decided April 29, 2021
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nadege Odena Jacob v. Franklin Hospital Medical Center, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nadege-odena-jacob-v-franklin-hospital-medical-center-ny-2021.