Nacron v. General American Life Insurance Co.

516 So. 2d 41, 1987 WL 1954
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 1, 1987
DocketNo. 87-433
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 516 So. 2d 41 (Nacron v. General American Life Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Nacron v. General American Life Insurance Co., 516 So. 2d 41, 1987 WL 1954 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal by the plaintiffs Julian Nacron and Bernard Selevan from a final order dismissing their complaint against the defendant General American Life Insurance Company. The complaint sought the recovery of a prepayment interest penalty which the plaintiffs paid the defendant for the privilege of satisfying, in advance of the maturity date, the outstanding principal balances due on two notes and mortgages held by the defendant. We affirm the final order under review upon a holding that (a) Section 697.06, Florida Statutes (1985), which provides that “[a]ny note which is silent as to the right of the obligor to prepay the note in advance of the stated maturity date may be prepaid in full by the obligor or his successor in interest without penalty,” (emphasis added) is, contrary to the plaintiffs’ position, inapplicable to the notes in the instant case because each note contains specific provisions for prepayment of the note in advance of the maturity date, (b) the parties in this case voluntarily agreed that the plaintiffs could pay the defendant the outstanding principal balances due on the above notes and mortgages in advance of the maturity date for a 10% prepayment penalty, and (c) the plaintiffs therefore have no cause of action against the defendant for the recovery of the aforesaid prepayment interest penalty because the plaintiffs voluntarily agreed to pay same, and, having done so, had an enforceable obligation to live up to this agreement. Compare § 725.04, FIa.Stat. (1985).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MacIntyre v. Hark
528 So. 2d 1276 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
516 So. 2d 41, 1987 WL 1954, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nacron-v-general-american-life-insurance-co-fladistctapp-1987.