Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity

562 P.2d 986, 29 Or. App. 203, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2245

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedApril 11, 1977

DocketNo. A-76-09-12835, CA 7328

StatusPublished

This text of 562 P.2d 986 (Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nacoste v. Chubb/Pacific Indemnity, 562 P.2d 986, 29 Or. App. 203, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2245 (Or. Ct. App. 1977).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

[205]*205PER CURIAM.

Claimant in this workmen’s compensation case contends that she is permanently and totally disabled. Of the 14 doctors she saw after her accident, only one agrees with her. We agree with the referee’s conclusion that "[t]he medical evidence * * * is persuasive that claimant’s problems are emotional and largely unrelated to the accident. The awards she has received are more than adequate to cover actual physical disability * * *.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed.

[205]*205PER CURIAM.

Claimant in this workmen’s compensation case contends that she is permanently and totally disabled. Of the 14 doctors she saw after her accident, only one agrees with her. We agree with the referee’s conclusion that "[t]he medical evidence * * * is persuasive that claimant’s problems are emotional and largely unrelated to the accident. The awards she has received are more than adequate to cover actual physical disability * * *.”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

562 P.2d 986, 29 Or. App. 203, 1977 Ore. App. LEXIS 2245, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nacoste-v-chubbpacific-indemnity-orctapp-1977.