Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc.
This text of Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc. (Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, M.D. Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION
NACIMA AUSTIN,
Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:25-cv-2103-SDM-AAS
CARGURUS, INC,
Defendant. _________________________________/
ORDER The parties jointly request that the court approve their stipulated confidentiality and non-waiver of privilege by inadvertent disclosure agreement. (Doc. 17). “Parties wishing to keep confidential documents obtained or disclosed during discovery, including for attorneys’ eyes only, may file a motion for a protective order, with a proposed order, showing good cause for the relief requested.” Middle District Discovery (2015) at VII.C; see also Baystate Tech., Inc. v. Bowers, 283 F. App’x 808, 810 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citations omitted) (stating courts may enter protective orders if good cause exists to protect discovery information). Good cause exists to enter this joint confidentiality agreement. Accordingly, the parties’ motion to approve their joint confidentiality agreement (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. The agreement attached to the motion is deemed incorporated herein. (Doc. 17-1). ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 9, 2025. Aranda. □□□ he Sarsing_ AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE United States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nacima-austin-v-cargurus-inc-flmd-2025.