Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc.

District Court, M.D. Florida·Decided December 9, 2025·No. 8:25-cv-02103·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION

NACIMA AUSTIN,

Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:25-cv-2103-SDM-AAS

CARGURUS, INC,

Defendant. _________________________________/

ORDER The parties jointly request that the court approve their stipulated confidentiality and non-waiver of privilege by inadvertent disclosure agreement. (Doc. 17). “Parties wishing to keep confidential documents obtained or disclosed during discovery, including for attorneys’ eyes only, may file a motion for a protective order, with a proposed order, showing good cause for the relief requested.” Middle District Discovery (2015) at VII.C; see also Baystate Tech., Inc. v. Bowers, 283 F. App’x 808, 810 (Fed. Cir. 2008) (citations omitted) (stating courts may enter protective orders if good cause exists to protect discovery information). Good cause exists to enter this joint confidentiality agreement. Accordingly, the parties’ motion to approve their joint confidentiality agreement (Doc. 17) is GRANTED. The agreement attached to the motion is deemed incorporated herein. (Doc. 17-1). ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on December 9, 2025. Aranda. □□□ he Sarsing_ AMANDA ARNOLD SANSONE United States Magistrate Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc., (M.D. Fla. 2025).

Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc. (Nacima Austin v. Cargurus, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baystate Technologies, Inc. v. Bowers
283 F. App'x 808 (Federal Circuit, 2008)