Nachod v. Nachod

166 A.2d 18, 402 Pa. 60, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 395
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided December 15, 1960·No. Appeal, 332·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from an order certifying the suit in equity to the law side of the court. In taking the appeal, the plaintiff relied for authorization upon Section 2 of the Act of June 7, 1907, P. L. 440, 12 PS §1228. But that section of the Act of 1907 has been suspended by Buie 1550(10) of the Pennsylvania Buies of Civil Procedure: Korona v. Bensalem Township, 385 Pa. 283, 284, 122 A. 2d 688. The appeal is, therefore, premature as having been taken from an interlocutory order which has not been made appealable by statute: see Section 4 of the Act of March 5, 1925, P. L. 23, 12 PS §675.

Appeal dismissed at appellant’s costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nachod v. Nachod, 166 A.2d 18, 402 Pa. 60, 1960 Pa. LEXIS 395 (Pa. 1960).

166 A.2d 18 (Nachod v. Nachod) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lustig v. Lustig
652 A.2d 393 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1995)
Samuels v. Hendricks
445 A.2d 1273 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1982)
T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. Cox
372 A.2d 721 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1977)
W. Homestead Bsd v. Alleg. Co. B. of SD
440 Pa. 113 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1970)
Local Union 249 v. W. J. Dillner Transfer Co.
249 A.2d 806 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Calabrese v. Collier Township Municipal Authority
248 A.2d 236 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1968)
Ridge Radio Corp. v. Glosser
208 A.2d 839 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)
McFarland v. Weiland Packing Co.
206 A.2d 18 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1965)