Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia v. State
Opinion
Opinion issued August 30, 2018
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
In a plea bargain case, a defendant may appeal only (1) matters raised by a written motion filed and ruled upon before trial or (2) after obtaining the trial court’s permission to appeal. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. art. 44.02; TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). Here, neither applies.
The trial court’s certification states that this is a plea bargain case and the defendant has no right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(a)(2). The record supports this conclusion. See Dears v. State, 154 S.W.3d 610, 615 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005). Accordingly, we dismiss. See Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (“A court of appeals, while having jurisdiction to ascertain whether an appellant who plea-bargained is permitted to appeal by Rule 25.2(a)(2), must dismiss a prohibited appeal without further action, regardless of the basis for the appeal.”).
We dismiss the appeal. We also dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Massengale. Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia v. State (Nachieli Zepeda-Garcia v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.