Nace v. State

Nevada Supreme Court

Nace v. State

415 P.3d 1004

Nevada Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2018·No. No. 75380·Published

Opinion

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for court to grant fee of $138,957.38 for compensation for work, labor and materials for being appointed by district court to represent self ... and an amended total cost to represent self." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elissa F. Cadish, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.¹

Given this order, we take no action on the pro se documents filed on March 21, 2018, and April 6, 2018.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is a pro se appeal from a district court order denying a "motion for court to grant fee of $138,957.38 for compensation for work, labor and materials for being appointed by district court to represent self ... and an amended total cost to represent self." Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Elissa F. Cadish, Judge.

Because no statute or court rule permits an appeal from the aforementioned order in a criminal matter, we lack jurisdiction. Castillo v. State, 106 Nev. 349, 352, 792 P.2d 1133, 1135 (1990). Accordingly, we

ORDER this appeal DISMISSED.¹

Given this order, we take no action on the pro se documents filed on March 21, 2018, and April 6, 2018.

Nace v. State, 415 P.3d 1004 (Neb. 2018).

Pincite

415 P.3d 1004 (Nace v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related