Nace v. Nace

Lehigh County Court of Common Pleas

Nace v. Nace

16 Pa. D. & C. 528, 1931 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 86

CourtPennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County

DecidedMay 4, 1931

DocketNo. 56

StatusPublished

This text of 16 Pa. D. & C. 528 (Nace v. Nace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lehigh County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Nace v. Nace, 16 Pa. D. & C. 528, 1931 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 86 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Reno, P. J.,

— The libel charging adultery with one William C. Connor was presented January 26, 1931, and a subpoena allowed on the same day. The record fails to disclose that “libellant caused to be served personally or by registered mail a notice on the corespondent named in the libel:” Act of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237, section 38. In these circumstances a decree cannot be entered unless and until the corespondent has had notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Now, May 4,1931, the case is recommitted to the master, who will designate a date for a further hearing and cause notice in the form prescribed by law to be served upon the corespondent, and thereafter he shall file a supplemental report.

From Edwin L. Kohler, Allentown, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reno, P. J.,

— The libel charging adultery with one William C. Connor was presented January 26, 1931, and a subpoena allowed on the same day. The record fails to disclose that “libellant caused to be served personally or by registered mail a notice on the corespondent named in the libel:” Act of May 2, 1929, P. L. 1237, section 38. In these circumstances a decree cannot be entered unless and until the corespondent has had notice and an opportunity to be heard.

Now, May 4,1931, the case is recommitted to the master, who will designate a date for a further hearing and cause notice in the form prescribed by law to be served upon the corespondent, and thereafter he shall file a supplemental report.

From Edwin L. Kohler, Allentown, Pa.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

16 Pa. D. & C. 528, 1931 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nace-v-nace-pactcompllehigh-1931.