NABUAL v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

NABUAL v. State

293 S.W.3d 482, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 2009 WL 2948728

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 15, 2009

DocketED 92459

StatusPublished

This text of 293 S.W.3d 482 (NABUAL v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

NABUAL v. State, 293 S.W.3d 482, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 2009 WL 2948728 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Richard Nabual, the appellant, appeals from St. Louis City Circuit Court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Supreme Court Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a *483 memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

Richard Nabual, the appellant, appeals from St. Louis City Circuit Court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his motion to vacate judgment and sentence under Supreme Court Rule 24.035.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a *483 memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 S.W.3d 482, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1353, 2009 WL 2948728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nabual-v-state-moctapp-2009.