Nabors v. Timmons
Opinion
Benjamin Ray Nabors appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Nabor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nabors v. Timmons, No. 0:12-cv-03301-DCN, 2013 WL 1207060 (D.S.C. Mar. 25 & 26, 2013). We deny the pending motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the [333] facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
538 F. App'x 332 (Nabors v. Timmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.