Nabors v. Timmons

538 F. App'x 332
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 26, 2013·No. No. 13-6585·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Ray Nabors appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Nabor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nabors v. Timmons, No. 0:12-cv-03301-DCN, 2013 WL 1207060 (D.S.C. Mar. 25 & 26, 2013). We deny the pending motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the [333] facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nabors v. Timmons, 538 F. App'x 332 (4th Cir. 2013).

538 F. App'x 332 (Nabors v. Timmons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Screening
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)