Nabors v. Timmons
This text of 538 F. App'x 332 (Nabors v. Timmons) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Benjamin Ray Nabors appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Nabor’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Nabors v. Timmons, No. 0:12-cv-03301-DCN, 2013 WL 1207060 (D.S.C. Mar. 25 & 26, 2013). We deny the pending motions to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the [333]*333facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
538 F. App'x 332, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nabors-v-timmons-ca4-2013.